|
|
Post by barry on May 4, 2011 23:01:44 GMT
Well done all, great night for it some excellent times posted.
Need to get the lad Reid to bump Fife AC and emblazon his chest with the red and white of Seaforth ! Think Mayeul was 38.57 but not sure as he was late replacement for someone I believe.
Results below
Steven Reid 00:35:10
Stephen Kay 00:37:13
Greg Templeton 00:37:23
Euan Webster 00:38:55
Laurence Baker 00:38:55
Paul Turnbull 00:39:25
Kevin Bloy 00:39:32
Peter Laing 00:39:36
Barry Duddy 00:39:57
Gillian Geates 00:44:48
Kenneth Robson 00:45:32
Lynsey Cooper 00:47:27
Laura Wallace 00:47:50
|
|
|
|
Post by ConnellD on May 5, 2011 13:38:29 GMT
64th 1049, Mayeul Ducrot 00:39:07 00:39:03  Well Done Everyone  . |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on May 5, 2011 21:13:50 GMT
Dont mean to be Mr Picky but I thought I finished in front of Mr Bloy! Maybe I was dehydrated!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by ConnellD on May 6, 2011 8:28:49 GMT
Dont mean to be Mr Picky but I thought I finished in front of Mr Bloy! Maybe I was dehydrated!!! Hi Peter, Laurence has gave you chip times. Peter Laing: Gun-39:39 Chip-39:36 Kevin Bloy: Gun-39:42 Chip-39:32 So you were over the line first but Kevin had the fastest chip time because he started behind you. CD |
|
|
|
Post by tokenenglishman on May 6, 2011 18:30:45 GMT
Wasnae me wot posted the times.
For championship purposes we will be taking the chip times so kevin was in front of Peter as CD explained in such a clear and concise manner.
|
|
|
|
Post by ConnellD on May 6, 2011 20:36:45 GMT
Wasnae me wot posted the times. Sorry Laurence, I should have looked back. CD |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on May 6, 2011 21:56:06 GMT
ok let me get this straight, from the gun you give it everything you've got & somehow the guy who finishes behind you beats you!!!
Will just have to run a bit quicker next time !
|
|
|
|
Post by barry on May 6, 2011 23:04:40 GMT
Twas me that posted results - simply took them from Troon site and let excel sort by time. Seems the right way to measure it , time taken to cover 10K rather than who stood nearest the mat. ;D
Peter could have gone quicker and only slowed to ensure he snared the the Easter egg. Cheers for all the links Connell.
|
|
|
|
Post by tonimac on May 7, 2011 20:43:14 GMT
For what it's worth I think 'for championship purposes' it should be the position that counts. Chip timing is useful to record times but in proper championship races it is the race that counts and, hypothetically speaking, if anyone were to break a record it would be the gun time that would be used. Just throwing in my thruppence worth, feel free to shoot me down
|
|
|
|
Post by ConnellD on May 9, 2011 14:59:05 GMT
For what it's worth I think 'for championship purposes' it should be the position that counts. Chip timing is useful to record times but in proper championship races it is the race that counts and, hypothetically speaking, if anyone were to break a record it would be the gun time that would be used. Just throwing in my thruppence worth, feel free to shoot me down They are arguments for both. Prizewinners should be judged by Gun times as if you're not up the front, you have accepted you will probably not get a prize. A good example of this ia a race where the fastest runner was talking to the person standing behind him when the race started and although he had the fastest time, he was second finished so did not win the race as it was his fault that he wasn't ready. However, if you are in pens (especially allocated pens) then your time counts from chip time, as the size of the race (and the rules) make it impossible for everyone to start on the line. Each club had different rules but Killie uses chip time as it's fairer, at club level for big races. |
|
|
|
Post by kevbhoy on May 9, 2011 18:47:16 GMT
I would agree with that connell.. good answer, you killie runners are a sensible lot!
|
|
|
|
Post by Peter on May 10, 2011 10:34:36 GMT
 am just sore as beaten by 2 seaforths & a 60 year old in the last few strides! need to train some more!
|
|
|
|
Post by barry on May 11, 2011 7:37:48 GMT
|
|
